Sabtu, 18 Februari 2012

Ultrasonography of chirrhosis

Real-time US, in combination with color flow Doppler US, is currently the most frequently used diagnostic imaging modality worldwide in the screening and evaluation of patients with cirrhosis (see the images below).[50, 51, 52, 53, 54] In addition to demonstrating the morphologic characteristics of cirrhosis, including hepatic contour, texture, and the presence of portal collaterals, Doppler US provides useful information on portal hemodynamics.[55, 56, 57, 58]
Female patient with cirrhosis showing "coarsened" Female patient with cirrhosis showing "coarsened" echo texture and enlarged left lobe of liverTransverse view, real-time ultrasonogram shows an Transverse view, real-time ultrasonogram shows an irregular external contour of the left lobe (arrow).
Real-time US can be used to detect ascites and splenomegaly, to differentiate intrahepatic or extrahepatic causes of jaundice, and to detect portal vein thrombosis in patients who have decompensated (see the images below).
Advanced cirrhosis. A nodular liver, echogenic in Advanced cirrhosis. A nodular liver, echogenic in comparison to renal parenchyma (R), is seen. Ascites also is present.Splenomegaly with longitudinal dimensions of 12.95Splenomegaly with longitudinal dimensions of 12.95 cm in a patient with portal hypertension and splenorenal shuntRecent development of a bland portal vein thrombusRecent development of a bland portal vein thrombus in advanced cirrhosis, with deficit of a Doppler ultrasonographic signal (arrow). Note the contracted liver and ascites.

Portal blood flow

Doppler evaluation in a patient with cirrhosis can demonstrate high-velocity blood flow in the enlarged hepatic artery, which becomes tortuous as the underlying degree of fibrosis increases (see the image below).
In cirrhosis, flow increases in the hepatic arteryIn cirrhosis, flow increases in the hepatic artery. In this patient, maximum flow was measured at 255 cm/sec. The resistive index increases in end-stage liver disease.
PI, a measure of hepatic arterial vascular resistance, is elevated in patients with cirrhosis, and Schneider and colleagues have determined that it correlates quite well with the HVPG.[59]
The normal direction of portal blood flow is maintained initially, but as the degree of cirrhosis progresses, damping of the usual triphasic signal in the intrahepatic veins and loss of respiratory variation in the portal venous system occur. Flow within the main portal vein gradually diminishes; bidirectional and (subsequently) reversal of flow may be seen, usually with accompanying development of collateral vessels, as shown in the images below.
As portal hypertension develops, the flow within pAs portal hypertension develops, the flow within portal vessels can reverse as shunts develop. The flow in this patient was reversed in the main portal vein (the flow pattern is below the axis as the blood flow is directed away from the Doppler ultrasonographic probe). The flow was also reversed in the left portal vein (not shown) and in the intrapancreatic portion of the splenic vein (also see the following 3 images).Flow is in the appropriate direction, away from thFlow is in the appropriate direction, away from the splenic hilum; however, this is because of the presence of a splenorenal shunt (same patient as in the previous image).Splenorenal shunt with continuous flow, as demonstSplenorenal shunt with continuous flow, as demonstrated on a pulse Doppler ultrasonogram (same patient as in the previous 2 images).Splenorenal shunt visualized by color flow DopplerSplenorenal shunt visualized by color flow Doppler ultrasonography (same patient as in the previous 3 images).

Collateral vessels

These collaterals are most frequently detected in the splenorenal region (21%), or as patent paraumbilical collaterals (14%) (see the images below).
Splenorenal shunt. This color flow Doppler ultrasoSplenorenal shunt. This color flow Doppler ultrasonogram demonstrates collateral in the perisplenic region (open arrow), with simultaneous flow in the left renal vein (closed arrow). Contiguity was demonstrated on computed tomography (CT) scans.A more advanced example of a patent paraumbilical A more advanced example of a patent paraumbilical vein, noted on a color flow Doppler ultrasonographic examination. Note the constant flow pattern on the Doppler flow trace, with a velocity of over 40 cm/sec.
In a study by von Herbay and coauthors of 109 patients with cirrhosis, the presence of collaterals correlated significantly with the presence of ascites, esophageal varices, and the inversion of portal flow, but not with splenomegaly.[58]
Doppler US continues to be used in the noninvasive physiologic evaluation of the portal tract in patients who, in an attempt to reduce the risk of GI hemorrhage, undergo pharmacologic modulation of portal pressures. However, Doppler US does not correlate well with intrahepatic pressures or with the portal systemic pressure gradient. For example, the evaluation of systemic flow in the femoral or brachial artery also has been studied, but only a 50% correlation is observed in reduction of femoral blood flow and portal pressure in response to propranolol treatment.

Effects of pharmacologic agents

The potentially confounding effects of pharmacologic agents on portal and systemic blood flow and resistance, coupled with a wide range of variability in individual response and observer measurements, continue to make this a perplexing area of investigation. A direct correlation of multiple flow parameters to the HVPG remains elusive.

Vascular impedance

Arterial vascular impedance can be estimated as the RI, which represents the ratio of the difference between the peak systolic and end-diastolic velocities to the peak systolic velocity. This can be measured directly in the superior mesenteric or hepatic artery. In addition to pharmacologic agents, however, numerous factors on the capillary and venous side can affect the RI. These include alteration of blood flow in the portal veins following a meal and the extent of development of collateral vessels, in addition to increased resistance from fibrosis or hepatic congestion because of fatty infiltration or right-sided heart failure.

Screening for focal hepatic masses

US has an established role in screening for focal hepatic masses, despite rather low specificity (see the images below).
Screening real-time ultrasonographic study. A tripScreening real-time ultrasonographic study. A triple-phase computed tomography (CT) scan was negative. A guided, ultrasonographic biopsy showed hepatocellular carcinoma in the right lobe of the liver. Note the pseudo-capsule around the lesion (best seen on magnified view).Screening ultrasonogram in a patient with cirrhosiScreening ultrasonogram in a patient with cirrhosis. A gray-scale real-time ultrasonogram shows a relatively hypoechoic region (< 1 cm) near the gallbladder fossa (arrow).
Demonstration of shunt vascularity by Doppler US enables a diagnosis to be made with high specificity (see the images below), but neovascularization occurring in small lesions may be below the threshold of detection of even sophisticated US systems.
Doppler ultrasonogram. A patient with cirrhosis whDoppler ultrasonogram. A patient with cirrhosis who has a hypoechoic mass, as detected on a screening ultrasonogram. The cursor placed at the edge of the lesion shows a vascular shunt with a maximum velocity of over 50 cm/sec.Multifocal hepatocellular carcinoma. The Doppler tMultifocal hepatocellular carcinoma. The Doppler trace at the margin of the mass shows a shunt vascularity of 120 cm/sec.
Multifocal lesions occasionally may be obscured, but in general, the lesions can be appreciated as tumor masses that either have vascularity or are avascular, but displacing, vessels (see the images below).
Screening for hepatocellular carcinoma. A real-timScreening for hepatocellular carcinoma. A real-time limited ultrasonogram shows an inhomogeneous liver. No masses were appreciated.Color flow Doppler ultrasonogram shows a prominentColor flow Doppler ultrasonogram shows a prominent feeding vessel (arrow) and a hypoechoic mass (M), in a patient who has cirrhosis with elevated alpha fetoprotein. Ascites (A) is noted. Computed tomography (CT) scanning confirmed a hyperattenuating hepatocellular carcinoma with satellite nodules in the right lobe of the liver.Multifocal hepatocellular carcinoma in a patient wMultifocal hepatocellular carcinoma in a patient with underlying alcoholic cirrhosis and ascites (A). This color flow Doppler ultrasonogram shows multiple masses (M) displacing vessels within the right lobe of the liver.
Pulse Doppler US is useful in demonstrating shunt velocity, as shown below, which in the author's population has been found to be highly specific for HCCA when in excess of 2.4 kHz.
Doppler ultrasonogram. A patient with cirrhosis whDoppler ultrasonogram. A patient with cirrhosis who has a hypoechoic mass, as detected on a screening ultrasonogram. The cursor placed at the edge of the lesion shows a vascular shunt with a maximum velocity of over 50 cm/sec.Multifocal hepatocellular carcinoma. The Doppler tMultifocal hepatocellular carcinoma. The Doppler trace at the margin of the mass shows a shunt vascularity of 120 cm/sec.

Portal vein thrombosis

Portal vein thrombosis, shown below, can be diagnosed with relative confidence if a distended portal vein is found that contains echogenic material in the absence of Doppler signal.
Recent development of a bland portal vein thrombusRecent development of a bland portal vein thrombus in advanced cirrhosis, with deficit of a Doppler ultrasonographic signal (arrow). Note the contracted liver and ascites.
Malignant invasion of the portal vein may be detectable as neovascularity within the thrombus, occasionally with direct contiguity with an intrahepatic lesion. (See the image below).
Color flow Doppler evaluation shows that the main Color flow Doppler evaluation shows that the main portal vein (arrow) is occluded, with the collateral flow adjacent.
Low flow within the portal vein may be misinterpreted as thrombus, and careful attention to technique is necessary to ensure that the sensitivity of the Doppler signal is optimized.

Harmonic imaging/intravascular contrast agents

The development of intravascular contrast agents (which have little or no toxicity) initiated a re-evaluation of ultrasonographic sensitivity and specificity, which early investigations have suggested are greatly improved. The technical performance of ultrasonographic systems concomitantly has been modified to insonate tissue optimally, as well as to detect and process vascular and parenchymal signals from contrast agents. Techniques that are used include harmonic imaging, which is designed to capture nonlinear resonant frequencies from tissue and microbubbles with enhanced signal compared to background noise.
The microbubbles can be disrupted by insonation at a high mechanical index (MI), which represents the peak negative pressure of the transmitted ultrasonographic pulse, and this produces a strong, very brief echo. The microbubbles can then be visualized at a lower MI intensity (< 0.5) without causing further disruption. The bubbles can be seen within vessels and are detectable within capillaries in which conventional Doppler techniques cannot detect flow.
HCCAs have variable enhancement patterns on contrast-enhanced harmonic US. Homogeneous and heterogeneous enhancement have been described by Kim and colleagues, correlating with CT-scan enhancement patterns.[60]Three of 8 patients in this study also had linear tumor vessels in the lesions, but globular or peripheral enhancement seen in hemangioma and metastases, respectively, were not shown. Wilson and colleagues described perilesional and intralesional vessels. In a pilot study of 3 patients with biopsy-proven HCCA, the authors found variable characteristics, including identification of tumor vessels within the lesion and increased echogenicity within the center of the tumor.
The use of harmonic power Doppler US remains in the investigational phase, as researchers study the impact of technical parameters, such as pulse repetition frequency, wall filter settings, and injection rates on lesion detection. The decreased sensitivity of harmonic power Doppler US, in comparison with conventional power Doppler US on precontrast, is more than compensated for on contrast-enhanced imaging.
Through the evaluation of characteristics related to contrast-enhanced US, including portal-phase enhancement, negative washout (also called negative enhancement), arterial-phase peripheral nodularity and fill-in, and degree of arterial enhancement, algorithms have been developed that allow a logical and accurate differentiation of HCCA from other lesions, such as hemangioma or focal nodular hyperplasia.[61]
In the foreseeable future, the use of contrast in US is expected to reduce the necessity for additional corroborative imaging studies and to increase reliance on this already widely available, reasonably economical, and adaptable modality.

Real-time elastography

Real-time elastography is a promising technique for the noninvasive evaluation of the severity of hepatic fibrosis. This technique has been commercially developed by Hitachi Medical Systems and was used by Friedrich-Rust and colleagues to assess liver fibrosis in 79 patients with chronic viral hepatitis. Using a stepwise logistic regression analysis in patients and controls to define a tissue elasticity score, diagnostic accuracy was 0.75 for significant fibrosis, 0.73 for severe fibrosis, and 0.69 for cirrhosis, with a highly significant correlation (Spearman's correlation coefficient = 0.48) between the elasticity scores and the histologic fibrosis stage.[62]

Role of US in biopsy and ablative therapy

The fact that US is readily available and can be used in the guidance of percutaneous biopsy and of ablative ethanol or acetic acid injection of focal lesions, as well as the fact that it can be employed in conjunction with radiofrequency (RF) probes for thermal ablation, means that selected patients to be evaluated, diagnosed, and treated using 1 modality. The use of US contrast agents (SonoVue®) has been helpful in differentiating viable from necrotic tissue, thereby improving diagnostic accuracy, particularly for lesions under 2 cm. Wu and coauthors achieved a better diagnostic accuracy for lesions that were evaluated by contrast enhancement prior to biopsy than for those that were evaluated with unenhanced US (97.1% vs 78.8%).[63]
In a representative study by Livraghi using percutaneous ethanol ablation, 5-year survival rates for patients with HCCA lesions that were smaller than 5 cm and who suffered from Child C, B, or A cirrhosis were 0%, 29%, and 47%, respectively.[64] Poorer results were obtained for multiple tumors or in the presence of portal thrombosis.

Degree of confidence

The presence of portal hypertension can be inferred based on the measurement of portal vein diameter; a sensitivity of 75% and a specificity of 100% for a diameter greater than 1.3 cm have been claimed. As previously noted, however, measurements of flow and vessel diameter are only indirectly related to portal pressure, and the degree and level of intrahepatic obstruction (presinusoidal or postsinusoidal), arterial flow to the liver, and capacitance of the collateral flow may affect flow parameters. Other findings, such as loss of respiratory variation in the diameter of the main portal vein or the presence of collaterals, are considered by Zimmerman and coauthors to be approximately 80% sensitive.[65]
Such a wide range of variability exists among patients that measurements of this nature should be considered useful only in research settings. If no other corroborative evidence has been obtained, caution should be used in interpreting these measurements as determinants of the presence of portal hypertension.
Ultrasonographic characteristics
The ultrasonographic characteristics of HCCAs are variable, reflecting the diversity of neoplastic differentiation. However, certain pathologic characteristics occur with greater frequency and are helpful in characterizing hepatic lesions on ultrasonographic examination. For example, a pseudocapsule may be identified as a halo on ultrasonographic imaging. Neovascularity with arterial-venous shunting, the hallmark of malignant transformation, can be identified by current ultrasonographic systems once a lesion has reached approximately 2 cm. Contrast agents that increase the signal-to-noise ratio enable tumor vascularity to be detected with greater sensitivity.
Ultrasonographic sensitivity
In patients with cirrhosis attributed to multiple risk factors, Fasani and colleagues report that, compared with CT scanning, US appears to understage patients with multinodular lesions.[66] The sensitivity of US is also reduced in patients with heterogeneous livers. This understaging may be significant when considering patients for transplantation or ablative therapy, indicating that corroborative imaging with MRI or CT scanning may be of benefit in patients with advanced cirrhosis or a multifactorial etiology.
US combined with intravascular contrast agents
US appears to be very promising, particularly when combined with intravascular microbubble contrast agents, in assessing the effectiveness of tumor ablation. Choi studied the tumor characteristics of 40 patients with 45 nodular HCC lesions 1-3.8 cm in diameter.[67] The patients were undergoing US-guided, percutaneous RF ablation with power Doppler US before and after intravenous injection of a microbubble contrast agent. In 33 of the 45 HCCAs, intratumoral flow was seen at power Doppler US before the administration of a contrast agent. After administration of the contrast agent, an increase in the degree of visualized flow was observed.
After RF ablation, none of the ablated tumors showed intratumoral flow signals at unenhanced power Doppler US, whereas 6 showed marginal intratumoral flow signals at contrast agent–enhanced power Doppler US. This correlated with enhancing foci that were suggestive of viable tumor in corresponding areas, as found at immediate follow-up with contrast-enhanced CT scanning. Thus, these preliminary data suggest that contrast-enhanced power Doppler US can be a promising noninvasive technique for assessing therapeutic response.

False positives/negatives

Regenerative nodules, dysplastic nodules, focal fat, and fatty sparing may mimic focal HCCA. Other nonmalignant hepatic neoplasms, such as hemangioma, may appear similar to HCCA, although arteriovenous (AV) shunts are uncommon. Focal nodular hyperplasia and liver cell adenoma may have extensive AV shunting, with this occurring most often in females.
The development of US contrast agents should further increase sensitivity; evidence suggests that the combination of advanced ultrasonographic imaging techniques (harmonic imaging) can increase the conspicuity of liver lesions (hence, the sensitivity of US when combined with microbubble contrast).

Computed Tomography of chirrhosis

CT scanning (see the images below) is useful for demonstrating the morphologic evidence of cirrhosis within the liver and in showing mesenteric and GI tract abnormalities, as well as the development of collateral vessels in portal hypertension.
Patient with cirrhosis showing tortuous hepatic arPatient with cirrhosis showing tortuous hepatic arteries in addition to enlarged left lobe and caudate (C)More advanced cirrhosis. Computed tomography (CT) More advanced cirrhosis. Computed tomography (CT) scan with a portal venous–phase image shows a markedly enlarged left lobe (L) and caudate (C), with an area of focal fibrosis and atrophy of the posterior right lobe, deforming contour (open arrow). Incidental note of prominent collaterals in lesser curvature region (white arrow)Computed tomography (CT) scan demonstrates irregulComputed tomography (CT) scan demonstrates irregularity of the external contour of the left lobe.Secondary manifestations of cirrhosis include thicSecondary manifestations of cirrhosis include thickening and edema of the small and large bowel, as well as of the gallbladder wall, which is more common in the setting of ascites and hypoproteinemia. A thickened small bowel is demonstrated here in a 51-year-old patient who has cirrhosis with marked ascites.Computed tomography (CT) scan demonstrating edema Computed tomography (CT) scan demonstrating edema of the colon in a patient with cirrhosis. Note the presence of marked ascites.Portal venous–phase computed tomography (CT) scan Portal venous–phase computed tomography (CT) scan demonstrating a thickened gallbladder wall, splenomegaly, numerous collaterals within the omentum (arrow), and marked ascites (A). The liver is atrophic and irregular in its external contour.Extrahepatic manifestation of cirrhosis. MesenteriExtrahepatic manifestation of cirrhosis. Mesenteric edema and stranding is identified (open arrow). (Note marked splenomegaly.) Same patient: A computed tomography (CT) scan at more inferior level, the root of the mesentery, shows infiltration around the superior mesenteric vein and artery (arrow).Development of extensive collateral vessels at theDevelopment of extensive collateral vessels at the lower esophagus, short gastric vessels places this 42-year-old patient with cirrhosis and portal hypertension at risk for a GI hemorrhage. Note ascites and marked splenomegaly.Same patient as in the previous image, section morSame patient as in the previous image, section more cranial. Varices are adjacent to and within the esophageal wall.A patent, collateral paraumbilical vein (arrow) arA patent, collateral paraumbilical vein (arrow) arising in the ligamentum teres is an indication of the early development of portal hypertension in a 56-year-old female patient with cirrhosis. This can be traced to the umbilicus and its anastomosis with systemic, superficial abdominal wall vessels in image below.Portal venous–phase computed tomography (CT) scan.Portal venous–phase computed tomography (CT) scan. Note the superficial vessel (arrow) anastomosing with the paraumbilical vessel (same patient as in the previous image).In this computed tomography (CT) scan of a patientIn this computed tomography (CT) scan of a patient with long-standing cirrhosis, the arterial-phase image is indicated by enhancement of the aorta and hepatic arteries (enlarged, tortuous right hepatic artery [RHA], arrow). The intrahepatic left portal vein also is opacified (arrow), as are numerous enlarged paraumbilical collaterals. Simultaneous enhancement of arterial and portal structures on the early arterial-phase images indicates the presence of a large arterioportal venous shunt. Marked splenomegaly is present. Note also the prominent superficial veins in the abdominal wall.Same patient as in the previous image, section morSame patient as in the previous image, section more caudal. The image shows a very large varix in the umbilical region (clinically evident as a caput medusa).Splenorenal shunt. Collateral vessels are identifiSplenorenal shunt. Collateral vessels are identified medial to splenic hilum and anterior to upper pole left kidney (arrow). Note gallstones, which are frequently present in patients with cirrhosis.Splenorenal shunt. A collateral vessel passes caudSplenorenal shunt. A collateral vessel passes caudally (arrow) and enters the left renal vein (open arrow) (same patient as in the previous image).A more advanced example of a spontaneous splenorenA more advanced example of a spontaneous splenorenal shunt, in a patient with alcohol-related cirrhosis. Upper figure: A large, dilated collateral vessel is present anterior to spleen (arrow). Lower figure: Collateral vessels contiguous with the perisplenic collateral vessel (arrow) feed into the left renal vein (open arrow).
Splenomegaly and the presence of ascites, depicted in the second image above, are readily determined.
CT scanning is commonly used to evaluate acutely decompensated patients with suspected subacute bacterial peritonitis, in order to exclude other inflammatory causes. CT scanning is valuable in characterizing lesions shown by US techniques or in evaluating decompensated patients with cirrhosis. In addition, it is increasingly being incorporated into the management of stable patients undergoing screening to identify neoplastic lesions.

Delineating lesions

With improved technology, which permits rapid dynamic scanning using helical or multi-slice CT scanners, scanning of the liver in multiple phases of contrast enhancement is now routinely recommended as the most sensitive method of detecting space-occupying lesions and evaluating vascular structures. However, substantial limitations remain in delineating small lesions (< 2 cm), particularly in patients with advanced cirrhosis.

Characteristic form of HCCA

The most characteristic form of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCCA) is a hyperattenuating nodule noted on arterial-phase imaging, with hyperattenuation and/or hypoattenuation developing on portal venous–phase imaging, shown below. On CT scanning, hyperattenuation in the arterial phase occurs in a variable proportion of cases, and in many instances, it is characteristic enough to permit confident diagnosis.
Arterial-phase computed tomography (CT) scan showsArterial-phase computed tomography (CT) scan shows focal fatty sparing adjacent to the gallbladder fossa (arrow), which mimics a small hepatocellular carcinoma. This abnormality became less visible on a subsequent CT-scan evaluation as the overall level of fatty infiltration decreased.A 51-year-old male who has cirrhosis with massive A 51-year-old male who has cirrhosis with massive ascites. On kidney, ureters, bladder (KUB), and digital scout view, small bowel loops are seen primarily in the midabdomen. The abdomen appears hazy. A computed tomography (CT)–scan axial view confirms the presence of small bowel loops floating centrally in ascitic fluid and of the existence of fluid in paracolic gutters.An abnormal soft-tissue density is seen (arrow) inAn abnormal soft-tissue density is seen (arrow) in the lower mediastinum, superimposed over the shadow of the descending aorta. This density represents massively dilated esophageal varices on the corresponding computed tomography (CT) scan (arrow), just above the level of the left hemidiaphragm, immediately adjacent to the aorta.Varices at the gastroesophageal junction (arrow), Varices at the gastroesophageal junction (arrow), demonstrated on an upper GI series. The varices become more prominently seen on Valsalva maneuver. A computed tomography (CT) scan in the same patient shows enhancing collateral vessels.Characteristic unifocal hepatocellular carcinoma iCharacteristic unifocal hepatocellular carcinoma in male alcoholic with cirrhosis. Precontrast scan shows 4.7-cm hypo-attenuating lesion in the left lobe of the liver.Arterial-phase computed tomography (CT) scan (sameArterial-phase computed tomography (CT) scan (same patient as in the previous image). Increased attenuation in the lesion is demonstrated.Portal venous–phase computed tomography (CT) scan.Portal venous–phase computed tomography (CT) scan. The hepatic parenchymal enhancement is increased and the lesion has mixed hyperattenuated and hypo-attenuated regions, with a central area of hypo-attenuation.

Attenuation

Nino-Murcia and colleagues described arterial enhancement with abnormal internal vessels or a variegated appearance.[21] In some instances, a single hyperattenuating focus may be the only evidence of HCCA, with no distinguishing characteristics on precontrast or portal venous-phase images. However, a proportion of lesions are hypo- or iso-attenuating on arterial-phase imaging. Dysplastic nodules also may be very similar to HCCA in their enhancement characteristics, shown below.
Regenerative nodules in patient with cirrhosis. EvRegenerative nodules in patient with cirrhosis. Evanescent multiple subcentimeter hyper-attenuating lesions on arterial-phase imaging. It is difficult to distinguish these nodules from malignant lesions. The nodules represent a continuous spectrum of response to hepatic injury, with increasing levels of dysplasia culminating in hepatocellular carcinoma.
However, hypoattenuating nodules depicted on a CT scan have high malignant potential. In the series by Takayasu and coauthors, 36 (60%) of 60 such lesions converted to hyperattenuating lesions, with the cumulative attenuation conversion rates of these 60 lesions reaching 58.7% within 3 years of follow-up.[22] Thirteen of the lesions were biopsied immediately after attenuation conversion was observed to prove that they were HCCA. The presence of hepatitis C viral antibody and lesion size at detection were correlated with the attenuation conversion rate.

Documenting complications

CT scanning is useful in documenting complications associated with HCCA, such as portal vein thrombosis, and can be used to identify malignant invasion with a high specificity, as portrayed in the image below.
Vascularized thrombus (arrow) enhancing within theVascularized thrombus (arrow) enhancing within the main portal vein on an arterial-phase computed tomography (CT) scan. A multifocal tumor is in the right lobe of the liver (M).
The images below depict multifocal HCCA, which is commonly associated with extensive portal vein thrombosis and/or invasion at the time of diagnosis. Often, extensive portovenous shunts are present.
Advanced multifocal hepatocellular carcinoma. A tuAdvanced multifocal hepatocellular carcinoma. A tumor nodule is in the right lobe, and there is an enlarged inferior vena cava with enhancement in the arterial phase (arrow), indicating malignant invasionSame patient as in the previous image. Arterial-phSame patient as in the previous image. Arterial-phase computed tomography (CT) scan shows tumor hyperattenuation and mass with hyperattenuation within the inferior vena cava.Multifocal hepatocellular carcinoma (same patient Multifocal hepatocellular carcinoma (same patient as in the previous 2 images). Note the prominent venous collaterals secondary to the inferior vena cava obstruction in the subcutaneous tissues.Arterial-phase and portal venous–phase computed toArterial-phase and portal venous–phase computed tomography (CT) scans show multifocal lesions of hepatocellular carcinoma in the liver and demonstrate no opacification of the left portal vein from the thrombus (arrow). Minimal right portal opacification in the portal venous–phase image is seen. The patient presented with hematuria.Portal venous–phase computed tomography (CT) scan Portal venous–phase computed tomography (CT) scan (same patient as in the previous image) shows collateral vessels. Enlarged portions of the right renal vein also are demonstrated (open arrow) and drain into the distended inferior vena cava (*).

Degree of confidence

The enlargement of the caudate lobe in cirrhosis, with other regions of retraction, is depicted in the image below and may be mimicked in patients with breast carcinoma metastatic to the liver who are undergoing chemotherapy. Young and colleagues suggest that the mechanism is through nodular regeneration.[23]
Breast carcinoma can mimic cirrhosis, with enlargeBreast carcinoma can mimic cirrhosis, with enlargement of the left lobe, irregularity of the surface contour, and development of portal hypertension (see patent paraumbilical vein on insert).
Outcome
Concerns regarding the evaluation of patients with cirrhosis and HCCA for transplant are related to the likelihood of a successful outcome based on the stage of the carcinoma; solitary HCCAs that are smaller than 2 cm can be treated successfully with transplantation. Survival rates diminish with the presence of additional or larger lesions, with a 5-year survival rate of only 75% reported by Mazzaferro and coauthors for patients with up to 3 discrete lesions that are smaller than 3 cm or with solitary lesions of 2-5 cm.[24]
Transplantation
Transplantation is of no benefit when the lesions are diffuse or multiple, because metastatic disease is usually present. The discovery of a lesion or multiple lesions in a patient with cirrhosis who is otherwise well compensated necessitates further imaging evaluation or biopsy to characterize the lesions accurately. This assists in deciding whether to refer the patient for transplant or other therapy.
Multiple abnormalities
Often, multiple abnormalities are present in 1 patient, including a spectrum of nodules in various stages of malignant transformation. One or more frank HCCAs may coexist with several dysplastic nodules and/or a multiplicity of regenerative nodules, making the likelihood of accurate pretransplant diagnosis minimal without highly refined imaging techniques.
In patients with advanced cirrhosis, peak enhancement of the liver is reduced and enhancement may appear heterogeneous, reducing the level of detection of focal lesions.
Distinguishing nodules from HCCA
Much effort has been devoted to distinguishing regenerative nodules from dysplastic ones, and dysplastic nodules from HCCA. CT scanning techniques, such as CT arterial portography ([CTAP], in which the liver is visualized following a superior mesenteric artery [SMA] injection in the portal phase) and CT arteriography (which utilizes direct injection into individual hepatic arteries, with imaging performed in the arterial phase), have been extensively investigated. Matsui and coauthors asserted that most low-grade dysplastic nodules have almost the same histopathologic and hemodynamic characteristics as those of regenerative nodules; therefore, they are iso-attenuating to regenerative nodules at CT scanning and are not usually visualized on CT arterial portography.
High-grade dysplastic nodules may have a decreased portal supply and an increased arterial supply, but Lim and colleagues found the presence of such changes to be extremely variable; the grade of nodular dysplasia does not seem to affect the presence of the portal and arterial supplies.[25]Differentiating dysplastic nodules from HCCA is a difficult task because some low-grade dysplastic nodules lose the portal supply and gain an arterial supply, while some high-grade dysplastic nodules retain the portal supply without gaining an increased hepatic arterial supply.
Monzawa and colleagues reported that small HCCAs may be detected more accurately by combining the characteristics of arterial-phase, portal venous–phase, and delayed-phase images.[26] A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis for combination 3-phase imaging was significantly higher than for arterial-phase and portal venous–phase imaging (Az = 0.940 vs 0.917).
In patients with advanced cirrhosis, a sensitivity of 88% for CT scanning in the detection of HCCA was obtained by Chalasani and coauthors, compared with 62% for AFP measurement and 59% for US.[14] However, the accuracy of 3-phase dynamic CT scanning in detecting tumors in cirrhotic livers smaller than 2 cm in diameter is in the range of 60%, with a somewhat higher accuracy for lesions of 2-5 cm (82%), based on a study by Lim and colleagues of 41 patients whose livers were explanted before transplantation.[27] This was corroborated by a study by Peterson and colleagues of 77 North American patients undergoing liver transplantation.[10]A prospective sensitivity of 59% for the presence of HCCA and a sensitivity per lesion of 37% were found.
A subsequent study of 88 patients undergoing orthotopic liver transplantation, evaluated pre-operatively with multidetector CT (MDCT) scanning by Ronzoni and coauthors, confirms that despite improved detector technology and scan speed, no real improvement in sensitivity can be expected from MDCT.[28]Observers detected 89 of 139 hepatocellular carcinomas in the 88 patients, with a sensitivity of 64%. However, the specificity was only 75% because many regenerative or dysplastic nodules were present, leading the authors to caution against overestimation of disease that might preclude patients from liver transplantation.
Characterizing nonmalignant lesions
CT scanning is useful in the characterization of nonmalignant lesions, such as hemangiomata, which occur with relatively high frequency in patients with cirrhosis. Other, more invasive forms of CT scanning have been evaluated over the past few years; Jang and colleagues reported evidence that CTAP and CT hepatic arteriography add little or no additional information to that obtained using triple-phase, helical CT scanning in the detection of HCCA.[29]

False positives/negatives

Dysplastic nodules may mimic HCCA. Nontumorous arterioportal shunt in livers with cirrhosis has been reported by Kim and colleagues as mimicking hypervascular tumor.[30]
A higher injection rate may increase the number of small, false-positive, hypervascular lesions. Ichikawa and coauthors studied 60 patients with suspected HCCA; they reported in 2006 that the use of an iodinated contrast injection rate of 5 mL/sec resulted in an 18% reduction in specificity, from 67% to 48%, with no significant change in sensitivity (88% vs 80%) compared with a 3 mL/sec injection rate.[31]